 |
Siiber.ee ei vastuta käesoleva artikli ega selle kommentaaride sisu eest!
|
Tartu Wilde Pubi pakub hallikat-hägust, hapukat "kanasuppi"
[29. aprill, 2003]
 Suvel astusin Tartus paljukiidetud Wildesse lõunat sööma. Tellisin kanasupi ja mulle toodi hallikas hägune ja maitsmisel ka hapukas leem, mille sees ujusid kaks õnnetut kartulitükikest. Maksis u 49 kr ja oli minu kõige hullem supikogemus, arvestades asjaolu, et olen söönud ka Ida-Virumaa kahtlasevõitu sööklates.
|
Kommentaarid
Espalda [03.07.13 03:52]
It might be worth pointing out the<a href="http://ruxxnw.com"> stucutrre</a> of CAMRA to give some background to the "Should CAMRA do XYZ" comments. There is a small group of ~15 paid staff based at St. Albans. Then there is the national executive (NE), a group of annually elected representative who are unpaid volunteers. Then there are the 200 branches who are operated typically by a small group (~10) active members, also volunteers. Then there's the other 98,000 members who don't actively get involved in CAMRA except through their very welcome subscription and patronage of pubs & beer.Aside from some key staff (such as Mike Benner) at HQ, it is the NE that directs most of the CAMRA policy on an immediate day to day basis. These guys are volunteers and are not on hand 24/7 to respond to every single issue as it arises immediately. They may feel that they need input and comments from the very loosely connected branch<a href="http://ruxxnw.com"> stucutrre</a>. Therefore, like a oil tanker, it sometimes takes CAMRA a lot time to discuss and therefore decide on a subject. Sometimes, the subject has long passed it's expiry date. So what naturally happens is that HQ/NE have to respond faster when they can but the response they come up with is not necessarily the grass roots feeling of the 2,000 active members.This isn't an excuse for a lack of response on this, just an explanation of how things work.It is equally not to say that personally I don't think the communication channels can't be improved but that's a separate discussion.Cheers, Rob.
Edy [03.07.13 03:52]
The CAMRA logic is as far as I can ascertain about 2<a href="http://ofypwgto.com"> tihgns</a>. Firstly they think that putting the price of a 40p can of lout up to a quid will encourage people to walk into a pub for a 3 pint. Secondly they feel they have to be on the side of responsible drinking what with them encouraging the drinking of pongy ale.A significant element of on trade business is the real ale they promote but they will have noticed that the real ale off trade is so small as to be insignificant. Off trade drinkers tend to have a higher number of wine and spirit drinkers, whereas in the on trade beer dominates. Also beer sales in the off trade whether cheap or premium do not tend to be secondary conditioned. Among the premium ales, most are brewery and not bottled conditioned. If the UK followed the US in terms of the size of the on trade relative to off, most of the pub trade would disappear and cask ale would be an even smaller niche than it is, and gets them all of a quiver.So CAMRA are desperate to reverse the long term trend to the off trade and think minimum pricing will help. Where they are wrong is that minimum pricing will not put an extra pound in the pocket of a drinker to spend in pubs and could very well have the effect of reducing the discretionary spend of many consumers. Also by conceding the price argument as the cause of social and health problems rather than culture, they concede the argument in both on and off trade.When price rises in off trade alcohol fail to solve any of the problems of early hour's fights in town centres, the next step is on trade prices and the argument is already lost.CAMRA ought to wake up, smell the coffee.
Mehmet [03.07.13 03:52]
You have an arch in your back..? I have that and i got adviced to <a href="http://fwzxyca.com">ineastd</a> of putting my hands up in the air i place my pointer finger and my thumb together to make a traingle and keeping your hands like that place them below your lower back/ass! It really helps me hope i could help
Rakesh [02.07.13 10:25]
At the moment, from my cozy seat far, far away, CAMRA enyjos a very positive image, encouraging the production and enjoyment of high quality ales and craft beers. I personally don't think that they really should jeopardize their agenda and position by trying to publicly take on a broader anti-prohibition stance.The problem is that over the years CAMRA has got itself involved in plenty of issues in the wider political arena - for example the notorious Beer Orders, supporting the liberalisation of licensing laws, and the current campaign against the pub companies.Given this, they can't claim that an anti-prohibitionist campaign is ultra vires.If they won't stand up against the neo-Prohibitionists, then I would prefer it if they concentrated on championing good beer and good pubs and abandoned all the wider political stuff - as, indeed, my local branch already effectively does. http://epqfdfeyx.com [url=http://afzggqyz.com]afzggqyz[/url] [link=http://eyqnpe.com]eyqnpe[/link]
Lehekülg: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
 |
veskitammi pubi
